Ravensbrück and blutwurst
No. Margaret Buber reports that this insight into the scriptural use of blood was independently gleaned from personal Bible reading. (Page 236.)
No. Margaret Buber reports specifically that "pod vegetables disappeared entirely, the fat in food became less and less, the weekly portion of fat stopped altogether, and jam was reduced to about a spoonful a week." She adds that the sugar was gone for them, and all they could scrounge was inferior fish paste and unpalatable vegetable salad. Thus, the blutwurst became a "superior item of food." (Page 236.)
Margaret Buber reports that she offered them liver sausage, but that they rejected it to her frustration. (Page 236.) The reason for this additional rejection could be that they had sound suspicion that blood was still a likely ingredient. Thus, a moment's reflection on their likely suspicion on blood being an ingredient would have diffused her frustration.
No. Margaret Buber reports that the minority view grew in number, and she describes all 275 of them as a "peaceful Bible Student Block," which agitated the SS enough to relocate a hundred miscreants, called "Asocials," into their barracks. This may be an unlikely reprisal if it remained a minority. As they were all in the same physical condition and had peace and unity among themselves, it appears that the minority view won out. (Pages 236-7.)ftn4
If the answer is 'no,' that she was among the initial 25 abstainers, that would be fine and commendable. If the answer is 'yes,' that may be interesting on a historical level, but on a religious level, it would be less than relevant, due to repentance. The ones who did eat it did so initially out of ignorance of the controversy. Then after personal Bible reading made the insight known, it was variance of conscience under the hostile conditions Nazi concentration camps were notorious for that permitted others to continue eating it. Shortly thereafter, the view of rejecting it grew in number to the point where they were seen as a threat to the SS's control. Therefore, the ones who ate it initially must have repented!—Acts 17:30.
In conclusion, there are many examples of Jehovah's Witnesses being faithful to God's law on the proper use
of blood, even under harsh and pressing circumstances.
2. Jehovah's Witnesses: Proclaimers of God's Kingdom. Brooklyn: Watchtower Bible and Track Society of New York, 1993. 158. (back)
3. Under Two Dictators. supra note 1, 236. (back)
4. Krause-Schmitt, Ursula. "Resistance and Persecution of Female Jehovah's Witnesses." Persecution and Resistance of Jehovah's Witnesses During the Nazi Regime. Ed. Hans Hesse. Bremen: Berghahn Books, 2001. 200-1. (back)
Last revised: May 30, 2007. Copyright © 1997 by Jehovah's Witnesses—Setting the Record Straight. All rights reserved. This web site is not affiliated with or sanctioned by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. However, every effort has been made to adhere to the current views published by the "faithful and discreet slave" (Matthew 24:45; Luke 12:42) through the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. The "Official Web Site of Jehovah's Witnesses" can be found at http://www.jw.org, and should be recognized as the authoritative source about the beliefs, teachings, and activities of Jehovah's Witnesses.